Donald Bradman and Jesus Christ
Donald Bradman is the greatest batsman who ever played the sport of cricket. He sits atop the list of Test Career Batting Averages, with a career average of 99.94.
For context, the next highest average is 61.87, with most batsmen having averages well beneath 40. This chart illustrates how Bradman towers above all others:
Don Bradman and journalism
We can be very sure that Don Bradman really existed, and that he really achieved his cricket scores. Why? Journalism.
There were dozens of journalists at the sports field, documenting Bradman’s matches. Radio stations broadcast his matches live, and the newspapers followed with coverage the following day. There is footage of Bradman playing cricket. He was available for interviews, and so was everyone else in his circles.
Above: Don Bradman and Stan McCabe at the WACA in Perth, 1938.
Jesus Christ and journalism
Let’s contrast Donald Bradman with Jesus Christ, who existed in a time before journalism.
We have no newspapers, or other contemporary media sources to verify the events that took place in Jesus Christ’s era.
Furthermore, the New Testament itself wasn’t actually written until many decades after the events it describes. The Book of Matthew, describing Jesus’ famous Sermon on the Mount, wasn’t written until the year AD 70 at the earliest. That is the most generous estimate, with many non-fundamentalist biblical scholars estimating that the work may not have been written until AD 110.
For context, that is like writers waiting until the 21st Century before first writing about Donald Bradman’s final 1948 cricket match.
Above: Miracle of the Bread and Fish, by Giovanni Lanfranco
The existence of Jesus Christ
Personally, I think it is extremely likely that Jesus Christ was a real bloke who actually existed on Earth. To doubt the existence of Jesus of Nazareth would be akin to doubting the existence of Cleopatra or Julius Caesar.
Above: The Miraculous Draught of Fishes, by James Tissot
However, where I differ from Christians is believing the claims about Jesus Christ. All the supernatural stuff.
Why do I disbelieve? Let’s think about how the story of Don Bradman would have been communicated in an era without journalism.
If Bradman had existed in a time before journalism
Donald Bradman was a great cricketer, who really did score an average of 99.94 runs. But what if we hadn’t bothered to write about him until 40 to 80 years after his career had ended?
In other words, what if Don Bradman’s sporting career was documented in the exact same way that Jesus Christ’s career is documented?
My guess is that the tales about Don Bradman’s career would have become more and more exaggerated in the intervening years. Maybe the stories would omit references to the 14 test innings that Bradman failed to even score above 10 runs. Maybe the stories would say that he always scored at least 50 runs per innings. Maybe he always scored at least 100 runs each innings?
Above: Donald Bradman batting, circa-1930s or 40s
Maybe the stories would exaggerate the importance of Bradman’s famous final innings. In reality Bradman was dismissed for 0 during his final innings, after facing two balls. Maybe the stories would say that he was dismissed on his first ball. Maybe the stories would say that Bradman died straight after his final innings, in a selfless gesture to the future cricketers of the world.
The point is, if we waited many decades before we wrote about Don Bradman’s career, the kernel of truth—that Bradman was a great player—may have bloomed into an exaggerated tale.
Above: Smiling study of Don Bradman, 1930s.
Conclusion: the tales of Jesus Christ predate journalism
So, that’s my view as a journalism-loving agnostic. Jesus Christ probably was a real bloke, who gave some inspiring speeches, and lived a life dedicated to good deeds. Actually, he mostly sounds like a political revolutionary in the vein of Mahatma Gandhi or Martin Luther King Jr.
My view is that the supernatural tales (walking on water, being born from a virgin mother, etc) are probably the exaggerations that crept in during the decades between his life and when the New Testament was written.
My view is akin to that of US President Thomas Jefferson, who created his own version of the Christian bible, which contained only Jesus’ moral lessons. Jefferson discarded the parts of Gospels which do not pass the common sense test, including talk of miracles, resurrections, and other supernatural occurrences.
Like Jefferson, I have no chip on my shoulder. Just a quiet disbelief without better evidence.
Above: Christ Walking on the water, by Julius Sergius Von Klever
Postscript: The Life of Brian
My views on this subject are influenced by my favourite film, the comedy Monty Python’s Life of Brian.
In the film, Brian is a hapless character who is born in the manger down the road from Jesus, and is later mistaken for the Messiah by a crowd of followers.
When writing the film, the Python team realised that it was simply not funny to mock Jesus Christ. In the film, Jesus is shown as an honourable person, dispensing valuable wisdom. By contrast, the humour of Life of Brian comes from mocking the silliness of everyone else who surround Jesus and Brian. This includes characters who start arguing over the meaning of “blessed are the meek”, immediately after the words have been spoken.
This 1979 BBC television debate between Python members John Cleese and Michael Palin, and Malcolm Muggeridge and Bishop Mervyn Stockwood is entertaining viewing, for those who value critical thinking and scepticism. The incredulous reactions of Cleese and Palin are priceless.
PPS: Update: 22 March 2019. I note that the podcast Skeptoid has recently posted an episode titled “The Historicity of Jesus Christ“. In that episode, host Brian Dunning could not find convincing arguments to support either that Jesus Christ did or did not exist. His conclusion is that Jesus Christ was probably a figure like Nostradamus: a relatively unknown person during his own lifetime, who notoriety has grown dramatically in the years following his death.